Back Home About Us Contact Us
Town Charters
Seniors
Federal Budget
Ethics
Hall of Shame
Education
Unions
Binding Arbitration
State - Budget
Local - Budget
Prevailing Wage
Jobs
Health Care
Referendum
Eminent Domain
Group Homes
Consortium
TABOR
Editorials
Tax Talk
Press Releases
Find Representatives
Web Sites
Media
CT Taxpayer Groups
 
Eminent Domain
Corporate abuse of eminent domain law « Great Plains Tar Sands

Also Check out the following highlighted below

Letter, 4/9: Senators' action deplorable

 

 

 

Corporate abuse of eminent domain law « Great Plains Tar Sands ...
All of you finding yourselves on the wrong end of corporate abuse of eminent domain may be interested in an appeal currently before the Texas Supreme Court.


April 12, 2012     by Carrie La Seur

All of you finding yourselves on the wrong end of corporate abuse of eminent domain may be interested in an appeal currently before the Texas Supreme Court.  In the case of Texas Rice Land Partners Ltd. and Mike Latta vs. Denbury Green Pipeline-Texas, LLC, the court held that a pipeline owner shipping exclusively for a corporate affiliate is not a common carrier within the definition required for exercise of eminent domain.  In a nutshell, eminent domain is a common law descendant of the sovereign’s power to take private property when needed for the common good, like road-building.  In the present day, private parties must show common carrier status, meaning that their project (transmission lines, pipelines, etc.) is available to the public on fairly negotiated terms.  If the project is meant for private use – as the court believed this pipeline to be – then it isn’t a common carrier and eminent domain isn’t available.  Corporations would have to buy easements from every landowner along the way on the landowner’s terms, and landowners could simply refuse.

For this reason, Denbury Pipeline is singing the virtues of respect for “corporate separateness” where common carrier status is at stake.  In the Motion for Rehearing, 4 attorneys from Houston and Fort Worth argue that all kinds of mischief will be created by considering it a private transaction when the corporate owner of a pipeline ships natural gas only for its corporate affiliate.  This is nothing but an extension of the “special rights for corporations” doctrine so favored by the people who brought us the Citizens United U.S. Supreme Court majority.  If Joe owned a pipeline and only used it to ship his sister Alison’s gas, it would be perfectly obvious that this was a private, sweetheart deal for a family member and Joe had no reasonable argument that his pipeline was a common carrier.  When corporations do the same thing, “corporate separateness” is suddenly the basis of our economic system, no matter how closely tied they are.  Corporations are not only people, apparently, they’re people whose intimate dealings can never deprive them of common carrier status and the fearsome, sovereign power of eminent domain.  So far the Texas Supreme Court has recognized this argument for the garbage that it is.  Let’s hope they stick to their guns (always a good bet in Texas).

tags: common carrier, eminent domain, Texas

http://tarsandspipelines.wordpress.com/2012/04/12/corporate-abuse-of-eminent-domain-law/

 

 

← Pipeline news from South Dakota

 

 

 

**************************

Letter, 4/9: Senators' action deplorable
Lincoln Journal Star, NEBRASKA,

It boggles my mind that all of our state senators, except for two, are doing everything in their power to allow TransCanada, a foreign company, to come into our state and steal our personal property with eminent domain.

TransCanada doesn't even have a permit or an application for a permit in our country. I thought we voted our senators into office to protect Nebraska citizens. Well, I was dead wrong. Does anyone see anything wrong with this picture?

Our legislators are putting in laws just for TransCanada. We paid state senators to have a special session to put in laws last year to protect us from pipelines, and at the time they exempted TransCanada.

Now that TransCanada's permit was rejected, our senators are making a new law so that TransCanada doesn't have to abide by the state law in place.

Eminent domain was supposed to be allowed only if a permit had been approved by the federal government. But here state senators are handing TransCanada our personal property on a silver platter. Eminent domain is supposed to be used in any case only if it is for the public good. We all know that Keystone XL is only going to be for the good of TransCanada.

It will not lower our gas prices; if anything, it will increase them. The picture gets clearer all the time, and it looks like our country has been overexposed to TransCanada.

Joyce Petit, Inland  http://journalstar.com/news/opinion/mailbag/letter-senators-action-deplorable/article_adadad5c-4eb5-5f72-a156-cae768606c86.html